The Fun Police really misinterpreted this. This is not saying anything about how good or bad LD is. I was just expecting something more like what TAS was to TOS. Other than the fact that TAS episodes were half the length and that the animated nature allowed them to afford to depict more exotic things like underwater scenes and six-limbed bridge crew members, TOS/TAS were mostly the same. They had roughly the same degree of adventure, philosophy, humor, etc. On the other hand, LD targeted a different audience by focusing on qualities that had not been prioritized in any earlier series. I was just disappointed by how different LD is from TAS.

  • esa@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Similarly, Steam has some option about “adult only games” that doesn’t seem to mean “you don’t have to keep asking me my birthday for ‘grim’ games”, i.e. games you have to verify you’re an adult to see, instead it seems to mean “show me porn games”.

    This kind of bowdlerised English or whatever it’s called is usually weird and confusing to us non-natives. Like, it’s apparently OK to have the puerile stuff, you just can’t be normal about it?

    “Adult” doesn’t imply genital stuff to the rest of us, USA.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    Dude, TAS was set on the flagship of the fleet, LD is set on a B grade tow truck.

    They are not the same

  • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think you’re missing the context of ALL the adult animation shows that came before it, because Lower Decks does something special in that category. LD takes the typical adult animation sitcom and mixes in the optimism and character writing from the best Star Trek shows, and it does this quite well. (By the way, they tone down the Rick and Morty stuff after the first few episodes, so don’t get discouraged if that’s what’s bothering you).

  • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    No one misinterpreted your original post. It was sarcastic and dismissive, so people responded with that same energy.

    As to the edit, I think it’s good that the new Trek shows each have such distinct personalities. They won’t all appeal to everyone, but the overall diversity is a strength. Part of what killed Star Trek in the 2000s was that TNG, Voyager, and Enterprise had all stuck to a very consistent approach. After close to twenty years, it was inevitably feeling a bit stale.

    • SatyrSack@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      It was sarcastic and dismissive

      So, yes, you misinterpreted it. Maybe that is how it came off to you, but that was not my intent. Whoops! I tried to find a Lower Decks gif that best portrayed “disappointment” without also portraying anything like “disgust”.

  • Zess@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Sorry you can’t enjoy something if you think it’s childish. Your life must be awful.

  • _NetNomad@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    i love lower decks but that’s in spite of and not because of the “adult humor.” the jokes that make me laugh- which is most of them!- would be exactly the same if it was an all ages program on Nickelodeon like Prodigy. the good does ultimately outweigh the bad, and signifigantly so, i just think it was a missed opportunity. i was pretty young when i watched TNG and TOS with my parents and probably would’ve gotten a huge kick out of LD

    apparently tawney newsome is gonna be writing on the starfleet academy show so that might end up being The Best of Both Worlds (Parts I and II) between all-ages trek and funny trek

  • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    You wanted Lower Decks to be more boring? I like a good conference room scene as much as the next Trekkie, but they only had 22 minutes to work with!

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ah, you added context. I fail to see however how you think your title was meant to convey “I thought it would be standard Star Trek, but animated so I was disappointed because my expectation was different”.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    That’s kinda how I feel about the majority of adult cartoons outside of shows like King of The Hill that feel more down to Earth in a way and less like a full-on highschool level comedy. I personally don’t like adult animation usually as a rule because of shows like family guy, robot chicken, and such. There are definitely a very small few exceptions like KoTH or Futurama, but in general those types of shows just weren’t made for people like me.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve never seen a feed of this that doesn’t have the profanity censored out. Is it just always sanitized or am I just not finding the adult version?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I think OP is so sensitive to the profanity that even bleeped is too much.

      And my god is T’Ana hilarious. I mean come on. The whole joke is the bleeping and the fact that she’s literally the only person in all of Star Trek that constantly swears.

  • MisterMoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I watched the first four episodes or so and what I noticed the most was how it seemed like every character was either yelling or speaking at high volume the whole time. It was exhausting. I really like R&M and I know this is from one of the key creatives on that show so it was super disappointing.

    • Shark03@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      My dad felt the same, but he powered through a couple more episodes and it gets noticably better, and has now seen all of it except the most recent season. They even make a joke about loud and fast they used to speak at one point. So if you’re willing to, I’d say give it a go it really is worth it imo.

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Had the same initial reaction, then I gave it a second try and I was in by the end of season 1. I roll my eyes when people say “it gets better after a while” but Lower Decks does take ~5-6 episodes to find itself. (Does Evil AI Jeffrey Combs do anything for you?)

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Four episodes don’t define a single season (especially when it’s the first season) let alone an entire show with five of them.