• samus12345@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    All it did was show a lot of people what bullshit a charge of “terrorism” is.

    • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      For the longest time, people thought “terrorism” meant “very evil,” so now that someone who isn’t evil is being labeled a terrorist, they are upset.

      In reality, if you try to change politics with violence against a civilian, you are a terrorist.

      “One man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.”

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s not what the law in NY actually says. It’s not merely that you’re trying to change government policy through violence. It’s that you’re trying to do it through intimidating government employees. The prosecutor screwed the pooch on this one. Luigi didn’t actually meet the terrorism modifier requirements in NY. At least that’s what I got from Legal Eagle.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s an incredibly flimsy argument. People have been writing messages on ammo since ammo existed. There’s not even an established pattern of terrorists writing on ammo - they’re more likely to claim credit for an attack after the fact and include their message there.

            Those were words for him. Deny and defend this, mother fucker.

            • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              You assert my argument is flimsy, yet your argument is that someone is going to be able to read the casings popping out of a guy’s gun shooting at him from behind?

              Lol. Lmao, even.

              • glimse@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Please tell me you’re trolling so I don’t think I’m talking to someone THIS obtuse.

                Do you think this writing was to make a political message in the wreckage? Do you think really I think the soldiers who wrote it expected the victims to read it on the way down?

                No, you moron, it’s a message to the victim that the killer knows they’ll never read. It’s a personal touch on the ammo that empowers the shooter. A more poetic version of “a bullet with your name on it”

                Added bonus for you

                  • glimse@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 month ago

                    Yeah because my Lemmy app posting twice is indicative of my intelligence.

                    I love that you have nothing to say about my comment so you point out the app bug. Very smart

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It certainly causes more terror, but mostly just with the rabble, not the ultra wealthy who actually matter.