• glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s an incredibly flimsy argument. People have been writing messages on ammo since ammo existed. There’s not even an established pattern of terrorists writing on ammo - they’re more likely to claim credit for an attack after the fact and include their message there.

      Those were words for him. Deny and defend this, mother fucker.

      • RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        You assert my argument is flimsy, yet your argument is that someone is going to be able to read the casings popping out of a guy’s gun shooting at him from behind?

        Lol. Lmao, even.

        • glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Please tell me you’re trolling so I don’t think I’m talking to someone THIS obtuse.

          Do you think this writing was to make a political message in the wreckage? Do you think really I think the soldiers who wrote it expected the victims to read it on the way down?

          No, you moron, it’s a message to the victim that the killer knows they’ll never read. It’s a personal touch on the ammo that empowers the shooter. A more poetic version of “a bullet with your name on it”

          Added bonus for you