• shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    21 hours ago

    blocking on mastodon, that user ceases to exist, and is no longer able to see, vote, or comment on your content. on mastodon, blocking is blocking

    on lemmy/mbin, blocking only serves to mask that users content, though they are still able to see, vote, comment, and mine your content for descriptive data which can, has, and will lead to doxxing

    “blocking” on lemmy/mbin is dangerous misnamed bullshit

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      though they are still able to see, vote, comment, and mine your content for descriptive data which can, has, and will lead to doxxing

      Like 100% of the internet, you mean?

    • atro_city@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I don’t get why the distinction matters. From your view, it doesn’t have an impact, does it?

      • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Have you ever worked with someone who has trauma? Triggers are more than the actuality of an event but knowing that the possibility to be hurt again. I’m not going to say more, but there’s a lot more to be said.

        • atro_city@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I mean, sure, but if you block/mute somebody and don’t see, hear, or feel them anymore (which is what the block on lemmy seems to do), when what’s the point of additionally signaling to other users “hey, I blocked you”? It seems like a great way to challenge them to create a new account and immediately antagonize you for blocking them to create the cycle again. And on the fediverse it’s even easier since they can just pick an instance that doesn’t know them.

          • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 minutes ago

            I don’t think the point is to signal to others. It’s to prevent the further mental deterioration from a traumatic event.

            I like Lemmy and the anonymity, but it seems to allow harassers to thrive then.

            • atro_city@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 minutes ago

              I don’t think the point is to signal to others

              I don’t think so either, but it is a side-effect if blocking were implemented like on twitter, were it not? Harassers would be aware they are blocked and find new ways to harass. Silent blocking (or the post calls it muting) is there better option, in that case, isn’t it?

            • atro_city@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 minute ago

              Context: Lemmy still allow people to comment on your posts or comments after you blocked them:

              Yes, they can comment, but the person blocking them doesn’t see it. The blocked person won’t know they are blocked, and the blocker won’t know the blocked person commented. I don’t see how that is bad. In the end, for the blocker, the effect is the same, is it not?