If you’re going to remove 90% of the content on lemmy, is there even a point staying on it?
If you’re going to remove 90% of the content on lemmy, is there even a point staying on it?
That seems like a huge oopsie in the design…
There needs to be an !upvotedbecauseboobs
the onus to supply backing to any given position or assertion is on the one claiming facts
Source, please?
Steam can get stats on how many games are being played via Proton. And I don’t see how we depend on them?
And that benefits Microsoft, how?
They’re pretty much the entire reason gaming on Linux is as active as it is today.
You do. But the point stands, on the scale of a govt budget, having a single full time employee (and even that is honestly overkill) is a drop in the ocean.
Apparently not, if you’re still thinking of Fediverse moderation as a single entity.
You do understand that the fediverse is not a single thing? Moderation on the fediverse is a meaningless term because it varies hugely depending which part of the fediverse you are visiting.
How much funding does a single software instance serving 3500 users really require? I could probably run it off my desktop.
What did I just read? It just seemed so incoherent.
Just Do It ✅
You might find a better environment at Beehaw? Not my cup of tea, but each to their own.
They exist, some models do alert you if you have something in the back seat.
It’s pretty misleading, since that’s not one of the parents who left their kids in a car
How’s that in any way relevant to the topic, though? Or are you just digressing? (which is fine)
Article about how and why these accidents happen, and the fallout
By the same logic however, mods would have no power to actually moderate. Their moderation ability is directly proportional to their potential for abuse. And I think we can all agree we’ve long passed the point where communities are able to survive without moderation, at least in their current form (which is what OP is discussing).