I’m getting sick every day at this Microsoft Windows slowness and bloat. I am trying to use as much Linux VMs as possible. I feel so unproductive on Windows. I also tried installing Linux on the office laptop. The problem is that Windows is officialy supported and the Linux is DYI. Once the IT departament changes it will sync up with Windows but Linux can be broken and you are no longer able to work. Next job I want to have full Linux laptop or at least Mac.

Besides:

  • Microsoft Office
  • Active Directory
  • Some proxy and VPN bullshit

Everything seems manageable and even better on Linux.

What is your experience?

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    My current company is being absorbed into a much larger company right now, got bought out earlier this year.

    I was the only IT for the smaller company, and I was using 100% Linux (Debian with KDE Plasma) on my laptop to administrate everything in our environment, which is mostly Windows.

    • Our DC with AD on it, I used Remmina to RDP into it for admin tasks.
    • O365 and Azure/Entra stuff was all in the browser.
    • Our ERP system is cloud-based, so browser was fine for that too.
    • Our access control system was cloud-based and the RFID card reader/writer was plug-n-play on Linux.
    • Our company SMB share worked fine with Linux in Plasma using my AD credentials.
    • I set up my company OneDrive sync using rclone, it also worked flawlessly.
    • Our Fortigate firewall VPN has a native Linux app which, although ugly as sin, works without issue.
    • I used OnlyOffice for a while, then switched back to LibreOffice. Both worked basically perfect, a few very minor font bugs, (bullet lists having a slightly different style for the bullets, etc.)
    • Teams, I used a wrapper flatpak for a while, which worked fine, then switched to the browser version of Teams. No major issues, I had a bunch of meetings, screen shares, webcam, presentations all on Teams in Linux, pretty seamless.
    • Email, Outlook in the browser is fine. I also used Thunderbird for a bit, but didn’t like how buggy it was in the Flatpak version, and the Debian package was way too out of date for my taste.

    Now that we got bought out, I am being forced off my Linux laptop and onto the new company’s Windows laptop, which really sucks. I am planning on quitting soon, as I hate using Windows and I am very underpaid at my current job as it is. Only real perk was not having to report to any IT manager/CTO, and being able to use Linux.

  • Nine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    MacOS, nearly everyone who does anything with development or ops is using a MacBook. Though lately more “normal” employees have been getting MacBooks too.

    • UNY0N@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      If this what works for work stuff, then more power to ya. I just hope you don’t do any personal stuff on there…

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      We have some client’s engineers who use MacBooks. I’ll just say that I’m wary of anyone technical using MacOS at this point.

      Though some of our devs use them too, but from what I’ve seen, they could just as well use Linux.

      • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Wary why? I work remotely in IT and manage a ton of Linux systems with it. Because my company has a large number of remote employees they limit us to Windows or Macs only, and have pretty robust MDM, security, etc. installed on them. Since MacOS is built on top of a unix kernel it’s much more intuitive to manage other unix & linux systems with it.

        Personally I haven’t used Windows really since before Windows 10 came out, and as the family tech support department I managed to switch my wife, parents, brother, and mother in-law all to Mac’s years ago as well.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          I’ve met some folks who’d use an Apple laptop as part of their general attempt to look more competent than they actually were, for managers and such. Or maybe just for their ego.

          If your choice is between Windows and MacOS - I dunno. Depends on how AuDHD-tolerant one can make MacOS. What I usually see doesn’t inspire confidence.

          • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            This is very anecdotal, but both myself and the vast majority of my peers use macOS as their base host system. I work in cybersecurity, specifically offensive penetration testing. Myself, most of my coworkers, and probably half of my peers I’m competing against at local conference CTFs or that I know at local meetups are using a MacBook host with VMs spun up to need.

            Something like 75% of my job is done in a Linux VM. Doing it on a MacBook is infinitely more pleasant than any other laptop I’ve ever tried using, regardless of what OS it’s running.

            Also, and again extremely anecdotal, the most technical people I’ve ever known were all using hackintoshes when I knew them, and would use MacBooks when away from the home/office.

            I really don’t understand where this “Mac products are for non-technical people who want to appear technical” trope comes from. MacOS is a phenomenal product for non-technical people. My partner is the least technical person in the world, but they started using macOS in art school and found it intuitive and easy to use. As a technical person, I appreciate the polished UI built on top of the Unix kernel and that I can do everything I need to do from a terminal shell. The fact that the product is excellent for both wildly disparate types of users is testament to how great it is imo.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              It’s different between countries, I suppose.

              Also people want different things. For me customizable desktops (say, FVWM however I want to script it) are important, because I easily get distracted and overloaded. I also can’t ignore aesthetics, and in my subjective taste Apple style is concentrated bad taste combined with arrogance. Also there’s something in their UI design making me feel nausea and get tired faster. I don’t know what it is.

              Other people want something else.

              It comes from subjective experience in a country where Apple is traditionally not very popular.

              I also can’t separate their disgusting advertising from their products, subjective again.

  • PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    Most places seem to issue Mac’s now for the role. I just create a 90% cpu & memory Linux VM on them and work from within that, with the exception of teams or zoom meetings being native on the Mac (no echo cancellation on linux VM’s, it seems). Works mostly well, but it is arm64 based linux, as the Mac’s currently are M series.

    Ended up going with Arch for arm64, as it had the simplest way to add widevine support to my browsers.

    Much better than being native on the Mac… Mac doesn’t give me the two select&paste linux 2nd copy buffer, doesn’t provide focus follows mouse, no auto-raise, and type in partially covered windows without raise. Essential for my workflow.

  • nentypaushessen@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well… i am feeling somewhat heretical writing this… but i am a happy ChromeOS user for years now. In my opinion its a very good middle ground between a super stable platform that JUST WORKS and with the integrated Linux VM i have the opportunity to Install the necessary tools for my work.

      • nentypaushessen@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yup, i use it for work and its not only allowed, but the company is at the moment evaluating if it would be feasible to move all our clients to ChromeOS(-Flex).

        I understand the general sentiment regarding Google, and it is somewhat earned, but if you compare Windows and ChromeOS (or the whole Google ecosystem) then its interesting to note that Google is (at least in my opinion) much, much more user friendly than Microsoft. No dark patterns, hassle free updates… it surely has its upsides.

  • The Doctor@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    When I could get away with it at work, I did.

    In the last… I want to say six or seven years, issuing Macbooks to sysadmins has been a common thing in the sectors I work in. Rather than put up with us going rogue and messing up license tracking by rebuilding our stuff with a distro of choice, management just throws OSX at the problem (us, we’re the problem) because operationally it’s close enough for our purposes.

    It’s not my choice or preference, but the money’s green.

  • Beko Pharm@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    What are your experience?

    My last “real” Windows experience was with WinXP and every time I have to touch Windows at the PC of a customer, which happens sometimes when the stars align, I feel like the first human that ever walked the earth.

    I have no idea how people get any work done on a system that is constantly nagging for attention, popups, restrictive Enterprise environment and non descriptive error messages. Nothing in this world seems to make sense or is presented in a unified way. Every dialogue or sub system seems to be it’s own isle stemming from another decade of tech. The experience for someone who is simply not used to Windows any more due to missing exposure is horrible.

    Heck a Mac feels alien to me too but in the end that’s still a system I could deal with given some time.

    Mebbe I’m spoiled by stuff like systemd, PipeWire, Wayland, btrfs and all that candy we get nowadays on a Linux desktop. I’m not even talking about privacy or FOSS principles at this point. Just the fact that the system doesn’t get in my face with ads or AI or “very important reboots” seems to be a revelation in 2024.

    • poinck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      That was me 2 years ago. Now, I am wondering how I got the work done until now on Win11. It just takes longer and compensation for overtime helps. And by compensation I don’t mean money; I get my time back, working less on other days.

      I will ask for a 4 day workweek. Every day without Windows is a good day. (:

  • somenonewho@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m in the lucky position that I always could work with Linux. I was working with people that couldn’t be bothered to run Windows on their Desktops (administering mostly Linux Servers anyway). In my first job we had a “Standardized” Fedora desktop that was actually attached to our AD so you could log in at any desktop with your domain user. However we did have internal tools and some software requirement that only were available on Linux meaning everyone in our department had a Windows VM for using those tools (kinda overkill but ok). My last job we didn’t have any standard other than the system had to be encrypted and had Eset installed other than that we could set it up he was we liked.

    Could I work with a Windows desktop? Sure I’m on the Terminal sshing into systems 98% of the time anyway but at the end of the day I love to simply be on Linux having a workflow I’m used to.

    Regarding Office I was just using Office online for anything that needed it.

    Getting Linux Systems into AD is possible (but of course requires cooperation on the side of the IT department)

    Proxy and VPN should mostly be doable (but of course might not be able to be deployed via Group policies)

  • Thomrade@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Ive just started in a government IT role; everything is windows, I use windows myself at home for games, but run WSL for hobby dev, home server management and stuff like that.

    This is my first sysadmin role, having come from a Dev background, and administration on windows feels like such a chore. Everything takes ten steps to do, lots of issues, and feels very counter intuitive. I am not enjoying it at all. I suppose actual large scale Linux adminning probably has the same issues and I’m putting it down to lack of experience, but there’s so many small niggly issues that I know I could solve if this was a Linux environment that I can’t due to how windows is set up.

    I’m hopefully getting to move into a more hybrid dev/admin role for some web stuff, but I firs thave to convince my boss to let me install WSL so O can have a sane dev environment for web dev.

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I got my IT department to allow me to use WSL2, because I have to clone and patch the Linux kernel for our embedded linux device.

    😁now I can install stuff, for which I otherwise would have need windows admin privileges, into WSL2, like steam (just for the fun of playing a windows game over proton on a ubuntu install on WSL2 which is just linux hyper-v emulation on windows -> games run very bad and seem do not use the nvidia card in the laptop 🤭)

    So my setup is for work windows running WSL if needed, at home, I have a macbookpro11,3 dual boot BigSur and up to date endeavourOS(Arch+KDE) as allrounder devices, a game PC running endeavourOS(Arch+KDE) (NVIDIA 970), a raspberry Pi W2 running my homebridge, an iPad pro for easy webapps (configure *arr services) and streaming. Other not so much PC coputing devices available are PostmarkedOS pine phone, TvOS running Atv, various game consoles with most CFW installed, and many iPhones (collected over time, self bought is only iPhone 4s, 5, 6, X and 12mini)

    So, I use them all big OSs 🤔 well, not really android anywhere… 😁 I just recognised that my router is BSD based (OpnSense)

  • lud@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I am a Windows admin but two of my colleagues who are Linux admins use Linux machines that are running Ubuntu+a few internal tweaks to make it better fit us. The Linux platform is developed primarily by one of the developers at the company and some others (primarily developers) also use Linux. The vast majority of the company uses Windows.

    There are also a few hundred Macs.

    I have been considering getting our flavour of Linux installed on a VM or maybe even dual booting for testing.

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’d use Linux for homelab if there was native Fusion, since I need that for school.

  • GunnarGrop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Windows 11, and the group policies doesn’t allow us to use WSL. We also can’t directly SSH into any servers so we have to go trough a Citrix session to a Windows 10 “admin server” and then SSH or RDP to a Linux server. And Windows Terminal isn’t installed on the Windows 10 server, so it’s either CMD or the Powershell terminal.

    It’s absolutely fucking miserable. I’m a Linux sysadmin who do a lot of automation (ansible etc) but also Python development. Try it yourselves and see how long you last! I’m jumping the fucking ship in a month though, thank the gods.

    All the result of an over confident “security organization”, with a lot of hubris.

    But the best part? It’s a $5000 work laptop, and my 6 year old Thinkpad (with Linux) runs laps around the thing any day of the week. Opening the file explorer takes, most of the time, 5+ seconds…

    Fuck my life, and fuck this company.

    • ILikeTraaaains@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      But the best part? It’s a $5000 work laptop, and my 6 year old Thinkpad (with Linux) runs laps around the thing any day of the week. Opening the file explorer takes, most of the time, 5+ seconds…

      In my previous job I was doing Java development on e-commerce (Hybris, then renamed to SAP Commerce) and the laptop (a beefy thinkpad) took ages from powering on to being able to work, also Java compilation could take 30 min and just starting up the project on local another 5.

      Had the opportunity to install Linux (the policy was that dual boot was required and don’t disturb IT with Linux issues) and oh boy, from turning on to being able to work was incredible fast. Compiling went from 30 to 5 min (with same Java official version from oracle in order to avoid any implementation discrepancies between openjdk and the oracle JDK in prod), and starting tje local server went from have enough time for preparing a coffee to seconds.

      Unfortunately my current job only allows Windows and the policies are too strict.

    • Kethal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I have a fairly new, expensive (not $5000 expensive though) laptop from work. It’s quite a high powered laptop. It’s full of administration crap that constantly runs in the background using 8 GB of RAM and at least 20% of the CPU, nonstop. Daily I run out of RAM and it freezes. I have a 15 year old laptop that, without exaggeration, is faster to use and can run more programs without running out of RAM.

    • pathief@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      I have several clients with this kind of setup. I’m always baffled at the amount of hoops I have to go through to connect to my Linux server. Sometimes I have to remote desktop to a windows virtual desktop and then use the citrix session to another windows machine VIA BROWSER so I can finally ssh to the machine. Are they trying to bore attackers to death?

      • mb_@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        LOL

        They are trying to bore only your customers, attackers have direct access (=

    • Psyhackological@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Oh my that sounds even worse than at my company. I don’t understand also why disallow WSL. And yeah I don’t think that this is laptop’s fault anymore, just has been enshititifacted with software bloat.

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Software dev here. The only Linux I ever hear of at my job is Open shift. That’s about it. We are neck deep into windows. And honestly, I don’t care. It’s a job and my bills are paid. My house is full of Linux, and I don’t care what a big corporation wants to use for their software.

    • poinck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      This mind set has it’s limit when you need to get something done, see your family after 8h of work and don’t log overtime for some stupid windows s****.

      But, yes, in most cases I just log additional unproductive time in my timesheet. It would suck, if I couldn’t compansate the overtime and leave work earlier on Fridays or so. Management has to live with the fact that working with Windows is not as efficient.

      • penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Right. But what can you do if your job has absolutely no interest in Linux? Force them? I’ve talked to some leads and managers and they laughed at the idea of using Linux. They just don’t need it for whatever they do. And 100% of our backend is SQL and C#. And you know how much they drool over visual studio and all those MS products.

        • poinck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Our dev stack could totally run on Linux, but management wants standardization for security reasons. We have a mixed environment of Win10 and Win11 and our scripts to setup and update the dev environment produce sometimes unpredictable results even on the same version of Windows. <_<

          We’re not even using WSL2 to speed things up because we don’t get enough time to adapt our scripts to configure docker to use WSL2.

          My next move will be asking to get Fridays off, because they denied my whish to use Linux. If they deny my part-time request, I will look elsewhere in 2025.

        • Metju@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          C# on Visual Studio is a fucking nightmare. Switched to Rider on WSL the first chance I had, not looking back.

          Then again, if this is running on .NET Framework, there is no choice, afaik. You get a buttplug made of barbed wire in Windows + VS, and you’ll like it

          • penquin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I couldn’t agree more, bud your last statement seals it. You WILL like it. Lol

    • Psyhackological@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      True but I miss quickness of Linux, being native with my apps and just having my environment. I don’t think I ever gotten a nice working environment as it is constant struggle. On Linux I can say it’s good enough.

        • Psyhackological@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah also I’ve seen some guys trying to have Windows OS with Linux VM. Or the opposite Linux OS with Windows VM for Office stuff. Sounds like a good agreement but with my barely working office laptop I don’t think so. It would be nice to have out of the box image support of office Windows though.

  • thejml@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    MacOS. Systems doesn’t want to support Linux, and the only other option is windows 11. A few of my coworkers have Win11 with WSL and fight it every single day. They’re diehard windows people who have been seriously considering moving to MacOS for their next round of upgrades.

    • tyw0kki@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      Same here. I really really tried with WSL but the experience is miserable.

      Swapped to MacOS and like night and day. I’d be perfectly happy with a £300 linux laptop though.

        • marlowe221@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah, I do all my development in WSL2 (Ubuntu) at work every day. I use VSCode on the Windows 11 host. It’s great!

          Would I prefer to use Linux natively? Sure, but I also have to support some Windows-only legacy code and a D365 environment or two, so Windows makes sense.

          • Kualk@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            I am happy with WSL as well. I don’t try to get Linux GUI running.

            I use vscode remote ssh session. I run docker natively on Linux, not on windows.

            The trick is to get DBUS services running in whatever flavor of Linux you install. Don’t try running a full UI session.

            The biggest problem I have on Linux is time drift after laptop goes to sleep. it is easy to deal with manually.

            • poinck@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              Do you have a guide that makes this possible?

              And what do you mean by using vscode remote ssh session? Does this vscode instance is started from the WSL via some kind of ssh- Y?

              • Kualk@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                Vscode is installed on windows. Then you install vscode ssh plugin from Microsoft and open ssh connection from vscode to any Linux including WSL hosted Linux.

      • Psyhackological@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yeah, it is slow in the end, not native, many things to configure (like proxies) and so on…

        Great! Was it hard also to switch to MacOS as a Linux user for work?

        • Kualk@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I actually run away from Mac. Mac OS X is long time as not Linux.

          WSL is a way better option than whatever VM option is on Mac.

    • barkingspiders@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 days ago

      Also Mac here. I started with a linux laptop but still have to do some desktop support work for the company and since they all use Mac it’s just easier to dogfood it. At least I have a decent terminal emulator.