Users will test, don’t waste your energy.

tl;dr a skill issue

Wow, that’s big. Thank you for the clarification.

I’m not familiar with the service, can someone explain? Like, are all pipelines on Azure affected? Or is it some internal stuff where a company relying on paid tech forgot to pay for it?

0% of Rust smh

I’m glad we aren’t friends.

So that’s why this figure is not in the title. Sharing such posts is disrespectful towards the community.

How’s this programmer humor?

Alright, this is my first contribution to an open-source project, albeit indirect. I’ll drink to that!

Somebody should tell Albert and the others, they can let this method go.

“p” should be lowercase, the metalbags aren’t that good yet.

Hey, by the end of the year we might reach 5%!

https://gs.statcounter.com/faq#page-views-uniques

We measure internet usage trends. To accurately measure usage, we have to base our stats on page views (and not unique visitors). Let’s look at an example:

Person X uses two browsers. On a particular day, they load one page in Browser A. They load 500 pages in Browser B.

If we based our stats on unique visitors then usage of Browser A and B would both be recorded as 50%. This is obviously incorrect. This does not fairly represent the usage of the browsers given that Browser B was used 500 times more than browser A.

Using page views as the basis of our stats means that Browser A will be recorded at less than 1% in our stats whereas Browser B will be recorded at over 99%. In our view, this gives a more accurate representation of actual browser usage.

You’re more cautious with a meme than that lady with a grenade.

Since I’m already using Bitwarden, generating and storing passwords is easy. I use my name as the username, though that user doesn’t have admin privileges.

If anything, this only proves their point: there is less of everything. Compare this amount of content a similar sub on reddit.

That sounds strange. I cannot comment on your particular case without seeing the test artifacts.

Generally speaking, there is nothing wrong with tests that ensure bad input doesn’t break the system, as this can easily lead to incorrect system states, damage to the environment, loss of data, money, reputation, and even lives - although most systems are not critical enough to threaten lives.

You wouldn’t need QAs if you only needed to validate that the product meets the requirements. In a typical company, many people are involved in that process. This includes the developer who wrote the code, the developer who reviewed it, and the people who conduct acceptance testing, among others. If your developers produce code that doesn’t meet the requirements, you’re in trouble.

I’m not saying that QA shouldn’t validate whether the system meets the requirements, but you don’t want them to do just that.

A QA engineer walks into a bar and asks where the bathroom is. The bar bursts into flames. The product owner says that the bar can be shipped anyway.

Great, it’s reliable and enforces design patterns!

I’m not surprised. A cube can’t be round. That’s an obvious design flaw.