Stamets@lemmy.world to tumblr@lemmy.world · 1 month agoGenerational Dividelemmy.worldimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1177arrow-down14
arrow-up1173arrow-down1imageGenerational Dividelemmy.worldStamets@lemmy.world to tumblr@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squareletsgo@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoA foot as in 12 inches. An inch is 2.54cm.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-21 month agoWhat’s that in bananas? Edit: sorry, I forgot I was on Lemmy. What’s that in beans?
minus-squareTrickDacy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThe only part that makes sense. I am not sure any tv was round and also who says “foot long diameter”?
minus-squareletsgo@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoEarly CRTs were round, like in the Manchester Baby computer. They got squarer as they started being used for TV, more so as the scanning technology improved. You’ll see early TVs from the 50s or so looking very squircular.
minus-squareTrickDacy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoYeah some CRTs used to be round but consumer ones afaik weren’t round at the time anyone could afford a 12 in display
A foot as in 12 inches. An inch is 2.54cm.
What’s that in bananas?
Edit: sorry, I forgot I was on Lemmy. What’s that in beans?
The only part that makes sense. I am not sure any tv was round and also who says “foot long diameter”?
Early CRTs were round, like in the Manchester Baby computer. They got squarer as they started being used for TV, more so as the scanning technology improved. You’ll see early TVs from the 50s or so looking very squircular.
Yeah some CRTs used to be round but consumer ones afaik weren’t round at the time anyone could afford a 12 in display