• kubica@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    195
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a thing that I’ve always thought that people over-complicate. It’s just there, the small side with the small number the big side with the big number…

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      113
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      “The entirety of the small number constitutes a relatively smaller portion of the big number. Thus, the open side of > points to the smaller number to indicate that it’s a magnified view within the larger number.”

      I hope this helps overcomplicate things for you. We must all return to crocodile.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Crocodile? Are you guys from Florida? In Europe we learned it as duck beak, it just makes much more sense, where are the teeth? Nowhere it’s not an alligator mouth it’s a beak

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      2 days ago

      For a while, I’ve seen “<” and “>” as a slanted “=”, which is to say, these numbers are not equal, and the larger side is the larger number and the smaller side is the smaller number.

      Works for me, IDK.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Are you a programmer? I’ve never struggled with them either, but I’ve had a lot of exposure to them due to programming since I was like 11

      • BlueMagma@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I am a software dev, I’ve been exposed to these since I was 5 and I’ve always thought they should be reversed, I know the logic is “bigger gap, bigger number” and never make a mistake, but deep down I know it would be more logical to “point the arrow toward the bigger number”, it just makes sense to me.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Somehow, people don’t teach this interpretation at schools. (Despite it being so obvious that it was clearly the original reasoning behind the symbols.) And then nobody talks about the fact that nobody knows how to read them, forever.

      Mine had something about crossing a line through the symbol and seeing if it makes a 4 or a 7. Honestly, “the crocodile wants to eat the big number” is still better than this.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is only tangentially related but I’ve noticed an increase in people saying backslash instead of slash when speaking an internet address aloud. I think many more people struggle with / vs \ than > vs <.

          • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            I remember it because I’m old and was into computers before the internet. Local drive was backslash "" as a directory separator and online it was slash “/”.

    • Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      Whoever my first teacher who taught me this did over complicate it, because when I wrapped my brain around bigger side equals bigger number and smaller side equals smaller (much later than I should have) it was a revelation and also seemed ridiculous it didn’t start out that simple.

    • abcd@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I agree. It’s totally simple and people overcomplicate.

      BTW one nice thing about German is, that you can even use the same logic for Boolean operators: The AND operator ∧ is called UND being the shorter word (when you put the name at the top). The OR operator ∨ is called ODER being the longer word.

      You can use the same logic in English if you Place AND/OR at the bottom instead 😁

      • Hoimo@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I always remember those as “knife” and “cup”, but you have to know that I use my cups the wrong way around.
        When you have two things AB on a table and you come in with a knife or cup (NB: upside down) from above, the knife will separate them “A or B” while the cup will catch them together like a pair of angry wasps “A and B”.

      • affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        i also think the “etymology” of the boolean symbols is very helpful in remembering which is which. in lattice theory, their use was inspired by similar notation in set theory. so, AB is like AB, while AB is like AB.

        generally, AB is “the smallest thing that’s greater than or equal to both A and B”, while AB is “the biggest thing that’s less than or equal to both A and B”. similarly to how AB is “the smallest set that contains both A and B”, while AB is “the largest set that’s contained in both A and B”. you can also take things a step further by saying that in the context of sets, AB means AB. doing this means that A ∨ B = A ∪ B, while A ∧ B = A ∩ B. and from this perspective, the “sharp-edged” symbols (<, , ) are just a generalization of their “curvy” counterparts (, , ).

        in the context of boolean algebra, you can set False < True, which at first may seem a bit arbitrary, but it agrees with the convention the that False = 0 and True = 1, and it also makes AB and AB have the same meanings as described above.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          for some reason to remember ∩ and ∪ when I first learned it in school I visualized a mirrored symbol on top. the ∩ looked like a X which represented an intersection, while ∪ looked like an O which represented a whole. for English ∪ already looks like a U which can be thought of as short for union. that would’ve been easier.

          • affiliate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            ooh the mirror trick is quite handy. i don’t think i’ve heard that one before. i’ll keep that one in my back pocket in case i ever need it some day. i can’t remember exactly how i learned what they meant, but i think it was probably u for union and n for ntersection.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Math is my worst subject by far. This was incomprehensible to me at first, but I read it a few times and I started to kind of get it, so thank you for that.

          In my mind, boolean operators meant things like AND/OR in internet searches. This functionality and using quotation marks to mean “these exact words” seem to no longer work on Google anyway.

          Does anyone know how to make these work the way they used to? I used to be quite the “google-fu” master, but search has gone to total shit.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        for English the AND sign looks like an A anyway. if you remember that for AND the OR is just the opposite.