• superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Greenland belongs to Denmark. Denmark doesn’t want to give it up. So annexing it would constitute an attack of one NATO member on another.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Exactly. Also, Europe can and likely will start its own defensive alliance sooner or later. But with the US constituting more than half the military power of NATO right now, that won’t amount to much other than keeping the Russians in check.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ah, so the issue is that NATO, in order to be effective, is very much dependent on the US being in it. Bother.

        • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not really, NATO is a nuclear power and a several times bigger conventional military power than Russia, even without the US.

          That said, it would be shit fighting against the US. For everyone involved.

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            It’s an interesting thought exercise - US has the base formerly known as Thule. My father was stationed there decades ago, however according to Wikipedia, it’s part of Space Command now. I can’t imagine that being much of an offensive force, nor being near anything.

            Meanwhile Wikipedia lists a Dutch navy detachment splitting time between there and Faroes

            Luckily it seems like both would have a difficult time asserting a military option, and any such misadventure would likely be dominated by the weather. It’s hard to believe the residents would approve