‘US government documents admit that the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not necessary to end WWII. Japan was on the verge of surrendering. The nuclear attack was the first strike in Washington’s Cold War on the Soviet Union. Ben Norton reviews the historical record.’

  • Rania Rudhan 🇩🇿🏳️‍⚧️@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The level of propaganda to not only justify turning innocent civilians into dust and basically fuck the land for the next life, but to also convince your population that it was necessary is something else

    • Water Bowl Slime@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly it doesn’t take any convincing to make Americans support atrocities. The US can just do them and Americans will invent justifications all on their own.

  • lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    One thing missing from a lot of the dialogue is choice of targets because they wanted to perform bomb blast studies on virgin targets

    Roll that over in your mind for a minute

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Japan’s Holocaust was as bad as the Nazi’s. They were killing, raping, mutilating, and enslaving millions of Chinese, Burmese, Korean, Vietnamese, and other peoples on a daily basis. Every extra day the Japanese empire was in power was another day of hell for millions of innocent people. Japan’s rulers know the War was lost after Germany fell. They were happy to keep the killing going.

    • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Your description of the conditions is correct but your conclusion is a non-sequitur. It does not follow logically that the only or best option to stop those atrocities was to mass murder civilians. Despite what the propaganda about the bombings that has since been inculcated into the western public claims, they were not in fact necessary for compelling Japan’s surrender. There were already internal disputes about this in the Japanese leadership for some time, but after their decisive defeat in Manchuria at the hands of the Red Army the decision to surrender as soon as possible became pretty much unanimous. Every day that went by was another day that the Soviets took more territory and came closer and closer - through the Kurils - to the Japanese home islands. The Japanese imperialists knew just as well as the Nazis that they stood a much better chance of avoiding punishment for their crimes (and some of them even being allowed to retain some power in the post war state) if they surrendered to the US rather than the USSR. Moreover we now know that the US leaders knew this. Their primary motivations were to have a live weapons test and to intimidate the Soviet Union.

  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    This video says a whole lot of nothing. It took 6 minutes to finally talk about people regretting, and that lasted another 5 minutes.