• Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    So explain how this is better than sand casting? Which doesn’t need glass particles and can provide much better surface finish?

    • Bonehead@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      With sand casting you still need a mold to form the sand. These molds aren’t easy to make, especially quickly. With this 3d printer, you can go from design to finished product long before the mold is constructed.

      • moody@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        There are also things that can be 3d printed that can’t be easily cast, like things with oddly-shaped holes, and hollow objects.

        This is the same as asking why 3d print something when injection molding exists.

    • rambos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Its not better probably, but I would rather have printed one because its more cool lol Seriously, casting have its own geometry limits compared to printing.

      • rambos@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Well, I watched a video after writing that, so my post is bit stupid. It probably doesnt apply for single layer shapes like ones shown on the video, but it looks faster than sand casting. Adding Z axis would make it more powerfull tho