pbpza@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoTIL that operating system Linux is an example of anarcho-communismen.wikipedia.orgexternal-linkmessage-square292fedilinkarrow-up1552arrow-down1110cross-posted to: foss@beehaw.org
arrow-up1442arrow-down1external-linkTIL that operating system Linux is an example of anarcho-communismen.wikipedia.orgpbpza@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square292fedilinkcross-posted to: foss@beehaw.org
minus-squaretherealjcdenton@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down13·edit-21 year agoThere are still laws and it has stability so no it’s not
minus-squareUnmapped@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down1·1 year agoAnarchy means no rulers. No hierarchy. There would still be rules/laws.
minus-squarechobeat@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 year agoCommenting with no clue what people are talking about
minus-squareCowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoAnarchy isn’t a rejection of structure, but a complex web of horizontal structures.
There are still laws and it has stability so no it’s not
Anarchy means no rulers. No hierarchy. There would still be rules/laws.
Commenting with no clue what people are talking about
Anarchy isn’t a rejection of structure, but a complex web of horizontal structures.