No /hj

Does anyone know about a speedtest that’s like iperf but multicore and suited for >100GbE? I’ve seen Patrick from STH use something that could do like 400GbE but I haven’t found out what it’s called

I could understand the argument if Immich relicensed to the FUTO Temporary License, which technically isn’t open source, but since immich is still AGPL this makes absolutely no sense

Don’t forget the 🫲🫱✋👐🙏💅☝️☝️👉👈👂🪓

Well it’s infinite so it has to I guess

What about “The ZipoApps of gTLDs”?

Looks like thunar (default file manager on xfce)

By that logic scratch would be the safest language out there (or can you tell me the last time a program written/built in scratch had a bug that affected millions of ppl around the world)

That cannot be true, i used #![forbid(unsafe_code)]

Jokes aside: yes, Rust (and Go) wont magically resolve SQL Injections, but if we remember that about 70% of bugs are related to memory safety, using Rust (or Go) will make your code at least somewhat safer

Yes, but there’s a difference between “you can write safe code” and “the compiler will come for your family the next time you make a mistake”

new 'a just dropped

Do the python people really call themselves “Pythonistas”?

i feel like it’s okay that they do this, but i don’t like the term “source available”. maybe something like “Free for Non-Commercial Use” or “FOSS-NC”?

Bold of you to assume you’ll find an actual human journalism product

That guy was talking about grayjay, a Client to follow creators on multiple platforms at the same time. Grayjay isn’t licensed under AGPL, but instead it uses the FUTO Temporary License. It technically still counts as source available, but I think the NC-Part is okay to have. AGPL would be nicer though especially bc of this.

Germany has a fund like that, GNOME just recently got a grant of about 1M Euros to improve features and provide better accessibility

The only thing I can see in their License that would make it non-free is the non-commercial redistribution part of it, which is not that bad

wtf

Linux Defender for Torvalds365

That list is either the undo-menu or the layers themselves, as everything you do in GIMP is somewhat destructive. This behavior will be changed in GIMP 3 tho.