Skeptic
Signal’s use case is “authentic communication”. like when a govt person interacts with other govt person and doesn’t want a second govt to snoop on the actual contents on the communication, but accepts that metadata is public.
It is whatsapp for such people, without being whatsapp.
But then why would you use whatsapp either ?
phone number isn’t just any metadata; it is the anchoring data around which the rest of metadata is collected, and it is also connected to govt/corporate verified real identity.
why would anyone even claim to offer privacy around such an anchor ?
Windows is no longer for power users. With each version, it kills the power of users some more, and asks for more powerful hardware like a hungry beast.
Right to repair must apply to cars as well.
… and the worth of human beings insulted.
To insult the Greek gods, obviously. Christ is not enough.
Lichess actually has some stuff not there on chess.com. One of the heavyweights in open source world.
Bon jour. Come back soon.
Is it time to write a new open source software?
Thank you. This does give an idea.
Follow up question : Is Arch really that good?
Is the data of specific distros available somewhere ?
Not to mention, they’re a multi-billion dollar company, don’t make excuses for them.
They pay someone handsomely to make excuses for them.
For an entity hat already has monopoly over violence, how difficult is it to claim monopoly over the collective will?
Big projects generally have their own websites to house their community. Example of LibreOffice comes to mind.
Obsidian?
What how so? They already have taken a deceptive consent from every registered user to show ads profiled on per user basis, and serve numerous clicks on their website that offer ads or ad-like stuff.
What is your alternative theory of why they are doing all this?
They can’t do what they are doing here without an intent to violate privacy.
Why isn’t a Rust kernel being developed in parallel ?