• 0 Posts
  • 7 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
Cake day: March 20th, 2025
  • jBoi@szmer.infotoTechnology@beehaw.org•The inarguable case for banning social media for teens
    4·
    2 days ago

    I would draw the line at having an algorithmic content feed as the primary way of interaction. TikTok, Instagram, Facebook (mostly), YouTube, Twitter, Reddit would be out or would have to drastically change their content discovery system. By algorithmic I mean - one that adapts to the user’s personal viewing habits.

    I’d classify stuff like IRC and web forums as communicators, in the same basket as WhatsApp, email, sms, and perhaps Discord. I agree that they have, in general, valuable social interactions. They also don’t have the same effect as algorithmic platforms where you can be scrolling for 2 hours and not remember a single thing you read, or where you’re served content tailored to keep you engaged.

    I’m sure there are some valuable platforms that would get hurt by this distinction, but imo it’s a good first guideline.

  • jBoi@szmer.infotoTechnology@beehaw.org•The inarguable case for banning social media for teens
    4·
    3 days ago

    Are you genuinely comparing social media to social interactions? Twitter for example is like a parody of what social interactions are, and I think this article is talking about things like Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, and other algorithmic platforms that give the user an anonymous feed of slop. I can’t imagine this is advocating for a ban on platforms like fb messenger, WhatsApp, ect. that aren’t nearly as invasive and generally do serve a good social function.

    The case isn’t clear for platforms like reddit and Lemmy imo, on one side they do have a slop feed effect, but they also feel a lot less aggressive to me for some reason.