• 0 Posts
  • 41 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle
  • The point, in one sentence:

    If you are the product, not the paying customer, then not only is there no incentive to cater to your needs, there exists incentive to make the product worse for you if it means the paying customer extracts more from you.

    Users of freemium software are basically nothing more than willing cattle. Housed and fed for free only to be slaughtered.

    Maybe people just can’t help themselves? I fear we can’t have a fair and free market if people are so easily manipulated.







  • SkyNTP@lemmy.mltoLinux@programming.devI'm done with Windows and Microsoft.
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The thing holding me back is multi monitor support. It’s just atrocious on Linux (and has been for a long time). I have issues with:

    • can’t duplicate screens (“not supported” huh?),
    • random screen not detected,
    • broken layout when screen changed,
    • flickering and constant layout changes

    Not sure if anyone has tips? NVIDIA and Intel displays, scarred to even try VR.










  • Asking your employer for more compensation because you are exerting more effort due to inexperience isn’t so different than a AAA studio charging high fees for a crappy product because of corporate bullshit and inefficiency.

    In fact, these two things tend to be two sides of the same coin.


  • I’m pretty sure Windows is a key part of their “cloud stuff” strategy. You are right that consumers are not the direct focus of Windows, since they are not the direct paying audience, and that shows in the direction Windows is going, but getting consumers to use Windows is a big part of creating corporate buy in for Microsoft cloud services. Corporate environments will shun Microsoft cloud services if employees can’t use Windows, or Windows features run afoul of corporate policies (like blanket LLM bans).