I do know that if you deploy an SOS beacon on mission, it doesn’t give you the SOS beacon to redeploy until you quit the game. To me this implies that your “SOS status” is set to On as soon as you deploy a beacon, until you stop playing (or maybe join someone else’s game.) If that is the case it would make sense that you could still be flagged as SOS On between missions.
Is it dumping you on a ship with a mission selected and Hellpods ready to board, or just idle?
I’ve noticed that there really can be a real difference between the occasional oopsie teamkill, and someone who is either unskilled or careless. When it’s just one guy in the group doing it, and he’s racked up 5-7 accidentals, there does need to come a point where responsibility is taken.
If the tail rotor was fucked with they wouldn’t have gotten that far off the ground. They would have started to spin as soon as their weight started to come off the ground, you have to be actively on the pedals at all times, not just when turning.
This was pilot error all the way.
This idiot fucked up a perfectly operational helicopter in clear conditions at a safe altitude. There is exactly zero chance he could have safely managed an autorotation landing. And he wouldn’t need to anyway, autorotation helps if the engine fails, but it was clearly still under power.
The rest of us want future articles to have none of whatever wanker came up with that clickbait-ass headline.
“The Cold Equations” kinda fucked me up not gonna lie.
It would help so much if you could team reload someone from the pack they’re wearing, if you don’t have one of your own.
Welcome to capitalism. Infinite growth is required, and when a market is well and truly saturated the next step is cutting more and more costs.
Incidentally, Cancer also pursues a similar strategy.
I mean, 3D printing itself was just a gimmick, some niche little curiosity that didn’t have any practical use. Things improve, new use cases emerge, times change.
For anyone who stopped reading at the headline, it’s because the material they were using didn’t reach the strength requirements of the project (5,000 psi), despite what previous tests had suggested (6,000 to 8,000 psi). With revisions to the material used, they intend to begin working on the second planned house in the spring.
Thanks, I hate it.
OP completely fails to recognize the AMR’s existence, but seems to think the Marksman Rifles should themselves be absolutely devastating to CHARGERS. If the Diligence Counter-Sniper is, in OPs world, supposed to be a .50 BMG, one can only assume the AMR should be at a minimum a 20mm cannon, at which point the Autocannon has to go up to, what, 50mm? And things like the Recoiless Rifle and other dedicated anti-armor weapons should just gib a charger with a single body shot.
Apart from ignoring that the AMR is exactly the weapon he wants, and his mistaken identification of DMR-style weapons as “Sniper Rifles,” OP just doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He states “There is very little, if any, armor that we know of that can stop a .50 BMG” which is just so hilariously wrong that that statement alone should flag the whole post as nonsense. We’re not just talking about plates that can fit in a human-sized plate carrier chest rig, we’re talking about alien bugs the size of an up-armored garbage truck. We’re talking about literal walking tanks, and for that matter actual tanks.