Americans will be like, haha look at this tiny car, while this car is still twice as big as your average European one.
Americans will be like, haha look at this tiny car, while this car is still twice as big as your average European one.
Its my home too. Does this make us flatmates?
No unfortunately I simply bought it in a shop in the Netherlands. And forgot the name.
What are the most important “points of control” that, in the case of Bluesky, are in the hands of this one company, and in the case of Mastodon (or the Fediverse at large?), are in the hands of the community?
It appears that on Bluesky, similar to Mastodon, you can start your own server by now. But on Bluesky you’re not (yet) able to have other users sign up to that server? And you can’t have your own moderation rules on your own server (yet)?
If I would start my own Bluesky server, and a friend does as well, would our ability to communicate be somehow still at the mercy of choices by the Bluesky company?
What is the practical difference between the AT protocol being controlled by a (public benefit) corporation, and it being controlled by a web standards body?
Disclaimer: I’m not a secret Bluesky fanboy. I just want to have the arguments ready to convince friends to not join Bluesky, and join Mastodon instead.
Amazing. That appears to be spot on! I was using Obsidentify and that one didn’t have a clue. And yes, very cool name indeed.
I read somewhere that pigeons normally live in little holes in cliffs, and that their “nests” are basically only supposed to prevent the egg from rolling out. So they are doing perfectly fine in their own way. In contrast to you and your stupid experiment.