Ruining a piece of art does not force people to do something about Global Warming. The reason everyone shits on activist types is because these stunts are clearly cries for attention and the supposed cause is just an excuse for college kids whose parents gave them money instead of love.

Not even going to attempt to defend your point?

Pissing people off does not make your cause palatable. Especially when there is no obvious correlation between what you’re doing to piss them off and the goal you mean to achieve.

In fairness to Katy Perry, it’s not her fault women at NASA are getting sacked and deleted from history.

Didn’t this happen last time? Less dramatically, but still.

He puts in a bunch of tariffs. China reciprocates. The market is thrown into chaos. He shouts and screams. China ignores him. He backtracks. China ends the tariffs but doesn’t do anything to try and appease him. He claims it’s a victory. His fluffers say the tariffs were just to bring China to the table, which justifies the hit to the market, despite the fact China didn’t come to the table and President Pigshit didn’t articulate what China could actually give him to end the tariffs.

And yet more than half backed Trump, by far the more pro-Israel candidate.

Not favoring Israel’s behavior is not the same thing as not supporting Israel existing.

And yet two thirds of Americans supported the most pro-Israel candidate we’ve ever had.

The youth never show.

And the “pro-war crowd” is larger than the “anti-war crowd” where it comes to Israel.

What makes you think that?

What evidence do you have?

The fact a bunch of people on Twitter said it doesn’t mean it’s a 1:1 ratio to voting.

All the polls agree people lean more towards Israel than Palestine. Particularly in swing states like Ohio and Pennsylvania.

You keep insisting that you’re not on their side, but you do insist we more or less are morally obligated to let them try to kill us without responding.

Furthermore, you demonstrate a clear double standard in your argument. If the only logical response to being bombed by the West is to attack Westerners, then doesn’t it stand to reason that the logical response to being attacked by the Houthis is to attack the Houthis? It’s the same as the arguments defending Hamas. You treat the Arabs as if they’re too stupid to try diplomacy while arguing we are morally obligated to endure being attacked by them.

Well you did just say you support the Houthis attacking Israelis, so you are rather proving my point.

They haven’t fired any rockets since the last bombing.

The Houthis are murderous terrorist slavers. I do not trust them. I do not care what they want. I want them dead. I may not support Israel’s war effort, but that does not justify the Houthis attacking us. They have chosen to make themselves the enemies of America and I expect them to be treated as such.

A tankie resorting to violence in immediate reaction to a political disagreement?

Must be a day ending in “Y.”

“They attacked us” is flimsy?

Does not even make sense.

You don’t support the Houthis, but you assert they’re doing the right thing by attacking international shipping to spite Israel, don’t think we should do anything to stop them and that we should let them get away with attacking us.

Right.

Bernie Sanders does not support the Houthis.

Show me five people who support your position that have won elections in the United States.

Your comparison is wrong because we aren’t occupying Yemen.

The average person does not want us to bow and scrape before terrorists.

So, you believe Israel started committing genocide as soon as it retaliated to the October 7th massacre?

You are wrong. They’re murderous terrorists.

They attacked us. My heart does not bleed.