2.6% increase in thread ops when copying data from user space seems pretty significant.

402 Payment Required: when they ask you to stay on late

411 Length Required: bad date. Don’t ask

413 Payload Too Large: great date

You have to trust the person you’re communicating with has turned it off. That’s my point. It’s an optional feature

There’s literally an option to turn it off

It can be turned off so it’s up to the person you’re messaging. Once you send something the person at the other end is in control of what happens to it.

No it’s not. It’s pedantic and arguing semantics. It is essentially useless and a waste of everyone’s time.

It applies a statistical model and returns an analysis.

I’ve never heard anyone argue when you say they used a computer to analyse it.

It’s just the same AI bad bullshit and it’s tiring in every single thread about them.

I literally quoted the word for that exact reason. It just gets really tiring when you talk about AIs and someone always has to make this point. We all know they don’t think or understand in the same way we do. No one gains anything by it being pointed out constantly.

I mean they literally do analyze text. They’re great at it. Give it some text and it will analyze it really well. I do it with code at work all the time.

Because they are two completely different tasks. Asking them to recall information from their training is a very bad use. Asking them to analyze information passed into them is what they are great at.

Give it a sample of code and it will very accurately analyse and explain it. Ask it to generate code and the results are wildly varied in accuracy.

I’m not assuming anything you can literally go and use one right now and see.

One of LLMs main strengths over traditional text analysis tools is the ability to “understand” context.

They are bad at generating factual responses. They are amazing at analysing text.

Just installed this and made my cursor bigger. Single best customisation I’ve ever made on windows!

No it was mostly putting a made up monetary value on the side of a bus and racism

Got to practise firing cannons mate

Exactly. Look at the state of it. We definitely should have taken that.

In fairness it likely wouldn’t be preserved otherwise. So you’re welcome.

That’s why we don’t like c

That would drive me crazy lol

I feel it’s kind of like comments. You don’t need to explain every change made as the diff does that. Just explain why the changes were made.

You can also optimize this a bit.

You can use Activator.CreateInstance instead of reflecting and invoking the constructor.

You can also call MethodInfo.Invoke, you don’t need to create a delegate.

Also worth noting that Source Generators have replaced the need for reflection in many cases.

There’s loads of options.

Plenty of science that could potentially save us if invested properly.

Lab grown meat. Carbon capture. Using said carbon capture for building materials. Nuclear fusion. Outer atmosphere energy generation. Etc.

There’s also cutting back on our consumerism.

Once it gets bad enough that it affects the super rich the world’s governments will miraculously and quickly act as one.

I would say being more inclusive is bringing value.

There’s a massive issue with women being under-represented in STEM and little things like this only further cement that.

It’s casual sexism. I’m not suggesting they are intentionally hating on women.

Assuming it’s a man because it’s programming is fundamentally sexist.

What downsides would they be?

I didn’t label him a sexist. But that is a sexist act. Assuming a man because programming fundamentally is sexist.