Yeah, the guy in the video said that as well, that’s why I was wondering if it’s in xbps-src.

I like the DE, seems really polished. Wonder if Void has it in xbps-src.

What happened to it?

Maybe… but still, in my experience it breaks a lot less than Arch. Hell, I even use it as an Ent distro, I’ve set up a few NASes on it, still hasn’t broken a damn thing, and most of them are running for like 5, 6 years now.

You can’t. Just have separate accounts.

Yep, using it as a daily driver for a long long time. It’s perfect for my needs and I just love the not-so-cutting edge approach, breaks a lot less than Arch does.

Everyone knows that, and everyone knows that BTRFS was released under GPL to restore the balance (as well as have the FS maintained and developed for free).

My point was, Oracle has contributed as well as RH. They offered to make RHEL instead of RH, RH do repacks. IBM is just greedy and we have seen where these sorts of things lead, to a dead company.

I don’t know, but any feature like that makes me wanna steer away from that product.

Hey, bo one’s forcing anyone to use a corp distro. I ditched Ubuntu comoletely as soon as I saw a pro feature in it. Now I’m on Void exclusively.

Yeah, that’s why is not in the kernel, it’s a separate package.

I know, but let’s face it, QEMU is not something you absolutely need to run an OS, like an FS for example.

Maybe…

Correct… don’t like that, but yes, that is correct.

Still, no one else did it… I mean, after RaiserFS, was there another FS released under GPL that was a viable alternative to EXT*?

Oracle does a have a point though, they did release ZFS and BTRFS as open source projects. Granted, RH has done the same with other software packages, but not something as important as a FS. ZFS was a finished product, BTRFS not so much, but still, these 2 are greatly valued in the open source community.

Not siding with Oracle, I don’t like them one bit, but facts are facts 🤷.

Yeah, like beehaw. I can downvote stuff on beehaw, tried it just to see if I can.

But, I don’t think they can see the downvotes.

No, that’s what I was trying to explain. If downvotes are disabled on your instance, you can’t downvote anything anywhere on any instance.

When you’re sky high with your FOSS buddies.

That shit never happens man, I hate it, everyone that is geeky enough to use Linux around here, doesn’t do weed 😡. Like it’s an RMS deadly sin or something.

No, looks like it’s a global setting. If your instance doesn’t allow it, you’re not allowed to downvote anywhere.

Aaaw, nice, I was looking for something like this 👍👍👍.