andypiper@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoMastodon 4.2 released, with (opt-in) search, and UX improvementsblog.joinmastodon.orgexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1245arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: mastodon@lemmy.mlfoss@beehaw.orgopensource@lemmy.mlselfhost@lemmy.mlfediverse@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1245arrow-down1external-linkMastodon 4.2 released, with (opt-in) search, and UX improvementsblog.joinmastodon.organdypiper@lemmy.world to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square28fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: mastodon@lemmy.mlfoss@beehaw.orgopensource@lemmy.mlselfhost@lemmy.mlfediverse@lemmy.ml
Lots of small improvements across the user experience, and opt-in search, make this an important release.
minus-squarewoelkchen@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoWhich privacy when it comes to posts explicitly tagged as public?
minus-squarepetunia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYou’re conflating tagging a post as public so that it is publicly accessible as being the same thing as consenting to being indexed in a search engine.
minus-squarewoelkchen@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoAnd why wouldn’t this be the same thing? Public content is public content. 3rd party services can already access the posts.
Which privacy when it comes to posts explicitly tagged as public?
You’re conflating tagging a post as public so that it is publicly accessible as being the same thing as consenting to being indexed in a search engine.
And why wouldn’t this be the same thing? Public content is public content. 3rd party services can already access the posts.