• Solumbran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Encryption is generally “open source” and that’s what makes is strong. Security does not come from people not knowing how things work, but by having properly designed things that work whether people know how they work or not.

      • poke@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It doesn’t seem to me like encryption is comparable here. With encryption we have known algorithms that are harder to reverse than initially run. This is a completely different problem, where many inputs are taken and some algorithm has to decide if they are human or not. What digital task can a human do that a robot can’t in the same way, especially if the robot knows exactly the measures it should aim for?

        • BOB_DROP_TABLES@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          exactly what recaptcha does, for example. Knowing that you have to type a word because a computer failed to identify which word is it makes creating a program that does that no easier. Same with the image ones. While criptography is a different problem, the argument is the same: you want something that can be verified to be hard to break otherwise someone will eventually figure it out

      • poke@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This isn’t a problem of security, this is a problem of deciphering between human and non human users.