• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    4 days ago

    We could do a lot for climate change, world hunger, homelessness, disease prevention and eradication, and so on with that much money.

    All of these people are doing mass murder via opportunity cost, and I hope they pay for it.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 days ago

      No, we must first further enrich Larry Ellison. The man clearly doesn’t have enough money.

  • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    When has AI been for the benefit of the people more then a trinket to toy with.

    It will benefit companies to streamline workflow (replace employees) and lock in patents at an alarming rate. Calling “First!” will cement decades of profit.

    Oh, and don’t forget behavioral training. You thought invasive ads were bad now…

    Fun times ahead! 😁

  • FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    The money will disappear into a hole, just like it does every time the US government invests into tech

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Most Ukraine funding is actually in the form of weapons, most of which have been sitting in warehouses in case of war with Russia. Now they get used before going obsolete and the US’s #1 rival is quickly becoming irrelevant without putting US soldiers at risk. We provide the weapons and Ukraine supplies the soldiers. I think we got the better side of that bargain.

      This whole idea that the US is spending money abroad out of some kind of altruism or that we just let other countries take advantage is preposterous. It’s always money spent in furtherance of US interests. We are the wealthiest country in the world in large part because we exploit the labor and resources of the rest of the planet.

      • dosboy0xff@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        In addition, none of that money ever leaves the U.S. If $500 billion gets spent supporting Ukraine, that’s $500 billion that goes from Congress over to U.S. manufacturers, who create the supplies and then ship those over to Ukraine. The money goes straight back into the U.S. economy. (People can complain about it going mostly to arms manufacturers, but in this particular instance I feel like helping a friendly country protect itself from a hostile invading force is a pretty good use of that money)

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          We could get a lot more benefit if we spent that money on building infrastructure instead of blowing shit up, but I still agree. Doing the right thing and US interests aligning doesn’t seem to happen very often. I think we have to act when they do.