Yes, but according to that same article, “49% of the SSNs exposed don’t include the minimum quality to pose a risk for identity attacks”. So it’s more like 136 million.
Even if only 51% of the SSNs exposed hold a minimal quality to be used in identity attacks, this translates to added risk to an unprecedented 138 million people.
Plus, identity attacks are not the only risk of this data being exposed. Stalkers, violent offenders etc. now have addresses/phone numbers and other info they can use as well. Their definition of identity attack also may not be the same as yours. Even if it’s just a name and SSN, that may not qualify to them, but could be useful to someone else in a negative way.
Yes, but according to that same article, “49% of the SSNs exposed don’t include the minimum quality to pose a risk for identity attacks”. So it’s more like 136 million.
Even still,
Plus, identity attacks are not the only risk of this data being exposed. Stalkers, violent offenders etc. now have addresses/phone numbers and other info they can use as well. Their definition of identity attack also may not be the same as yours. Even if it’s just a name and SSN, that may not qualify to them, but could be useful to someone else in a negative way.