Imagine your friend that does not know anything about linux, don’t you think this would make them not install the firefox flatpak and potentially think that linux is unsafe?

I ask this because I believe we must be careful and make small changes to welcome new users in the future, we have to make them as much comfortable as possible when experimenting with a new O.S

I believe this warning could have a less alarming design, saying something like “This app can use elevated permissions. What does this mean?” with the “What does this mean?” text as a clickable URL that shows the user that this may cause security risks. I mean, is kind of a contradiction to have “verified” on the app and a red warning saying “Potentially unsafe”, the user will think “well, should I trust this or not??”

  • federino@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s not specific to browsers, but to every flatpak that is verified and has the potentially unsafe warning.

    • eveninghere@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      “Verified” doesn’t mean too much to privacy advocates. There have been incidents. I indeed want to check what my app is going to access before installing it.

      • federino@programming.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think it’s okay to check what the app is going to access in your system. I’m just talking about the warning design, this comment suggests a different approach for a less alarming design.

        • eveninghere@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ah, very good point! If we all had the dedication for UX like you do, Linux would be so so so perfect.