minnixA to Philosophy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoNoam Chomsky, 95, ‘no longer able to talk’ as intellectual’s ‘health deteriorates’www.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1431arrow-down18
arrow-up1423arrow-down1external-linkNoam Chomsky, 95, ‘no longer able to talk’ as intellectual’s ‘health deteriorates’www.independent.co.ukminnixA to Philosophy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·5 months agoYour position is: We don’t know what it is, but AI certainly won’t have it? Does not seem rigorous.
minus-squareSweetpeaches69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-25 months agoLol. Lmao even. Imagine thinking so rigidly. Plenty of things were known of before it was known how exactly they work. My position is: We know something is causing this, but our understanding of it is currently infantile.
Your position is:
We don’t know what it is, but AI certainly won’t have it?
Does not seem rigorous.
Lol. Lmao even.
Imagine thinking so rigidly. Plenty of things were known of before it was known how exactly they work. My position is:
We know something is causing this, but our understanding of it is currently infantile.
QED