SeahorseTreble@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 1 year agoIf one innocent person is tortured so that everyone else can live and the world doesn't end, is that simultaneously unfair but also morally preferable over complete destruction of everything?message-squaremessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up115arrow-down14
arrow-up111arrow-down1message-squareIf one innocent person is tortured so that everyone else can live and the world doesn't end, is that simultaneously unfair but also morally preferable over complete destruction of everything?SeahorseTreble@lemmy.world to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squareTerevos@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI came to say the same thing. This is exactly what Christianity believes. But of course, it was Jesus who gave himself willingly. If he was forced to do that, it would’ve been reprehensible because he was the only truly innocent person who ever lived.
I came to say the same thing. This is exactly what Christianity believes.
But of course, it was Jesus who gave himself willingly.
If he was forced to do that, it would’ve been reprehensible because he was the only truly innocent person who ever lived.