Google’s AI model will potentially listen in on all your phone calls — or at least ones it suspects are coming from a fraudster.

To protect the user’s privacy, the company says Gemini Nano operates locally, without connecting to the internet. “This protection all happens on-device, so your conversation stays private to you. We’ll share more about this opt-in feature later this year,” the company says.

“This is incredibly dangerous,” says Meredith Whittaker, the president of a foundation for the end-to-end encrypted messaging app Signal.

Whittaker —a former Google employee— argues that the entire premise of the anti-scam call feature poses a potential threat. That’s because Google could potentially program the same technology to scan for other keywords, like asking for access to abortion services.

“It lays the path for centralized, device-level client-side scanning,” she said in a post on Twitter/X. “From detecting ‘scams’ it’s a short step to ‘detecting patterns commonly associated w/ seeking reproductive care’ or ‘commonly associated w/ providing LGBTQ resources’ or ‘commonly associated with tech worker whistleblowing.’”

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    not admissible in court

    I get what you’re saying there but that sounds very much like the kind of detail that s possible future Trump administration wouldn’t much care about

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That is probably the dumbest thing you said all week. At least, I hope it is because i don’t want to know how much dumber than that you can get.

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            … Wut?

            Obama was authoritarian? I’m intrigued; Exactly what mental gymnastics are you using to get that idea in your head?

            Few simple facts. Obama served twice. First time he won, and he had to campaign again to be elected a second yime.Second time he couldn’t run again for the third time, so he didn’t.

            Where exactly do you see authoritarian? Fox news quotes not allowed for answers here, I don’t need sad lies. Simple facts, what did Obama do to be authoritarian?

            I can’t wait…

            • ᴅᴜᴋᴇᴛʜᴏʀɪᴏɴ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Ask how many civilians Obama killed without congressional approval under the War Powers Act.

              Google the IRS targeting conservatives under Lois Lerner and sanctioned by the Administration.

              • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                And you call that authoritarian?

                Man you need to leave the house more often.

                For one, he supports democracy, which kind of already takes the foundation away from under your arguments.

                I’m not saying that any of those things are good (though the latter seems to not be something he directed anyways) but a lot of that is what the US does, or have you forgotten Iran, Iraq, Chile, Nicaragua, el Salvador, Afghanistan, Vietnam… I can go on for a while, but you get the idea.

                None of it is good, but if you want to compare Obama to any Republican president, I can quite easily tell you he’ll come out on top. I don’t particularly like US presidents, most are really rather dumb, egocentric, and so on, but he really wasn’t that bad.

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Second reply as the first was just … Trying to understand your mental state.

            Trump claimed multiple times that he loves and admires dictators. Not my claim, his. Trump said he wants to be a dictator. He said he wants to be a dictator for one day. This week he said he would like to add a third term for himself (against your precious constitution that you always love to ignore when it’s inconvenient)

            No other president in the history of (mostly rather shitty) presidents has ever done any of those things.

            And you want to steer away from Trump to another president when talking about authoritarian?

            The guys literally told you he wants to be a dictator, why won’t you believe him?

            Why has the US collectively been taking crazy pills making conversations like these even necessary in the first place? What is wrong with you people…