Too many people are confusing the two. Whenever lemmy.ml or its devs do something stupid, people go “Lemmy is getting worse and worse,” or “I’m leaving Lemmy,” or worse, “I’m leaving for Beehaw.”

If you’re using Beehaw, then you’re using Lemmy. Lemmy is the software these instances run on. If you don’t like lemmy.ml, join another instances that have rules that match your philosophy. Some instance hosts authoritarian or fascist shit? Turn to another Lemmy instance. Lemmy.ml is not even the biggest instance. People who just joined and are unfamiliar with the platform will just think the entire Lemmyverse is run by autocratic admins if we don’t get our terminology right.

  • bilboswaggings@sopuli.xyzEnglish
    3·
    2 years ago

    Karma is important? The only “use” for it is to do what? users farm it so adding karma or something similar would just make this place worse

    • carl_dungeon@lemmy.worldEnglish
      21·
      2 years ago
      • it can be used to differentiate troll accounts from people that make generally liked comments
      • it gives users a rush and encourages participation
      • it can help with ranking

      Now, that said, there are ways to game those things too, but that’s the concept and some of the bigger benefits.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        2 years ago

        A picture of a kitten in the appropriate general forum or a statement agreeing with the general opinion on a top comment on some politcal forum will get many times more Karma than a post on an expert forum that took 30 minutes to validate and write and is anchored on a decade of domain expertise.

        Beyond it’s utility (for commercial social media sites) as a gamification element (a score, which incentivises people compete with each other in producing easilly digestible content that pleases the general population in a forum - which, note, doesn’t mean its correct, well researched or anchored in genuine domain knowledge), Karma, at least as done in Reddit, is near useless.

        Maybe some kind of per-forum Karma or just a per-forum summary of the reception of past posts for a user might be useful, but “score”-Karma just indicates the ability to produce lots of content (so, produced quickly, hence almost certainly not validated) which is popular in large forums (which are invariably the generic ones).

      • hatter@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        2 years ago

        I still receive PMs every once in a while from random people on Reddit thanking me for comments that I’ve posted years ago. Those comments have less than 20 karma combined. I also have a comment saying “Nice.” which contributes nothing and is sitting at almost 3000. Karma is meaningless.

    • Quinten@lemmy.worldEnglish
      02·
      2 years ago

      I’m not a karma whore, otherwise I would not post on Lemmy. But when you post something and you see that people agree with it is nice to see. I do not see the problem with karma.

      • Quentintum@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        2 years ago

        I think there’s a difference between upvotes and karma. Seeing upvotes on a particular post is nice. Having a score of the sum of all your upvotes and having it displayed to everyone is a different matter, in my opinion. I feel like it gets taken as a gauge of the quantity/value of a person’s contributions, when there are low-effort ways of gaining karma, hence the problem some may have.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.netEnglish
          1·
          2 years ago

          Its a gamification tactic to keep people addicted to Reddit. It’s definitively not a good thing, in my opinion

    • WhiteTiger@lemmy.worldEnglish
      03·
      2 years ago

      User engagement is important, and karma is one way of driving that engagement. Pretending something’s not important from your high horse because you don’t understand it just makes you look like a spez.