Which one(s) and why?

  • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is Manjaro good if I want in on this Arch goodness but don’t want to spend hours configuring stuff? Coming from Fedora

    • Haven5341@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I haven’t used Manjaro myself but I heard that it is not as good as Arch. Rumors I heard where that it is not as solid as vanilla Arch. YMMV.

    • nexussapphire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I really have bad luck with Manjaro, even when I don’t use the aur it always breaks on me. I just stick to arch, I started with it and I’m sticking with it.

    • neo (he/him)@lemmy.comfysnug.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      If you plan to use the AUR, absolutely not.

      If you don’t plan to use the AUR it’s probably fine, but I haven’t used it personally in the last few years so I’m not sure.

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Endeavour is better for that, after the install you’ll have plain arch but with a bunch of stuff installed and already set up

    • alsimoneau@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve been running it on my work laptop for 6 years at this point and I’ve had no major issues I couldn’t solve.

      Having said that, I recently switched my gaming rig over to endeavour and it’s been great.

    • million@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I haven’t used it personally but I’ve seen a lot of folks bad mouthing Manjaro.

      Lots of complaints of instability and it being poorly run project. One of the more objective complaints I’ve read is they have a slower release process so security fixes take longer then Arch.

    • chepycou 🇻🇦@rcsocial.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      @SubArcticTundra @Haven5341 I personally think Manjaro is a false good idea.

      You’ll have an “out of date” system (i.e., one-month-old) but packages from the AUR which are made for the up-to-date system.

      Quite a nightmare to use IMO (and that’s not talking about Manjaro leadership and certificates problems)

    • RachelRodent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      No. Manjaro is more likely to break than arch because they hold of updating their pakages. What you are looking for is EndavourOS. I consider it to be “the new manjaro”

    • Nyanix@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve been daily driving Manjaro for 4 years without any issues. Generally speaking I’d recommend seeing if there is a flatpak for an app before using AUR. I don’t update as soon as updates are out though, so usually any issues there may have been have been shmoothed over before I get to it.

    • Luella@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve been using manjaro for around a year. It broke on me once, probably my fault, idk. I enjoy it! I’ve distro hopped many places and a year is a long time for me, so much about it is right for me. You’ll certainly get a worthy experience of what arch is capable of, I believe.

      That being said, I plan on swapping to arch really soon.