The ’90s called, they want their phones back.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/10105454

• Gen Z’s nostalgia for the early 2000s is sparking a revival of landline phones, seen as a retro-chic escape from the digital age.

• Influenced by '90s and 2000s TV shows, young adults like Nicole Randone and Sam Casper embrace landlines for their vintage appeal.

• Urban Outfitters capitalizes on Gen Z’s love for nostalgia by selling retro items like landline phones alongside fashion trends from the '90s and 2000s.

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    0·
    9 months ago

    You’re free to go thru my post history and try to find examples of me calling people hurtful names. You just wont find any because that’s not how I behave and that’s not what my question is about.

    My question is pretty simple; why this specific term? It feels so arbitrary. There doesn’t seem to be any logic behind it. I wont get mobbed if I call someone an idiot but for some reason retard is off limits. Why?

    • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
      0·
      9 months ago

      I don’t care about your post history. I am talking about what is in front of us right now.

      Idiot is unkind and I personally avoid it but it is not on the same level and you know it. There is no debate here. You know what my argument is, you just don’t care. That is your prerogative. But you do not get to be shielded from judgment.

      Clearly it is incredibly important to you to use ablest slurs. You go ahead and live your life the way you want. But you’re not going to get permission from me or anyone who objects. Welcome to social consequences dude I don’t know what else to tell you.

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        0·
        9 months ago

        I feel like you’re completely ignoring my original question. Seeing that despite being controversial it has 12 upvotes and zero downvotes then maybe that’s an indication that it’s a valid question and I’m not the only one wondering the same thing.

        • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
          0·
          9 months ago

          If barely double digit vote counts are how you decide what is right and wrong then we have nothing to discuss.

          Mine above you is 42/1 (I’m willing to bet that 1 is you but I’m too lazy to check) so there you go. Stop using the term because the numbers said so.

          • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
            0·
            9 months ago

            I’ll take that bet.

            I haven’t made any moral statements about right and wrong. It’s a simple question about why something is the way it is. Simple question you refuse to engage with so no point in going any further with this.