lemux
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf to homelab@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year ago

Banana Pi BPI-M7 router board now available for $165 (RK3588 processor, dual 2.5 Gb Ethernet, WiFi 6 and BT 5.2)

liliputing.com

external-link
message-square
30
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • sbcs
55
external-link

Banana Pi BPI-M7 router board now available for $165 (RK3588 processor, dual 2.5 Gb Ethernet, WiFi 6 and BT 5.2)

liliputing.com

sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf to homelab@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
30
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • sbcs
Banana Pi BPI-M7 router board now available for $165 (RK3588 processor, dual 2.5 Gb Ethernet, WiFi 6 and BT 5.2) - Liliputing
liliputing.com
external-link
Banana Pi BPI-M7 router board now available for $165 (RK3588 processor, dual 2.5 Gb Ethernet, WiFi 6 and BT 5.2)

Does this look like a decent starting point for a first router build?

Cross posted from: https://lemux.minnix.dev/post/204890

  • lemmyuser100002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    How is the software support? It seems like you could alternatively get a nice quad-core x86 Intel box with a handful of 2.5G ports off of AliExpress for around $120(you’d have to bring your own RAM and SSD in those cases though) and enjoy full Ubuntu/OpenWrt support.

    • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tfOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      According to the official website, it will officially have Android 12.0, Debian 11 and Buildroot support and will unofficially support Armbian, Ubuntu 20.04, Ubuntu 22.04 and Kylin OS.

      As for x86, I’d really like to try and avoid it for a router.

      • davidfreina@lemmy.davidfreina.at
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        As for x86, I’d really like to try and avoid it for a router.

        Why? (genuine question)

        • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tfOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a couple levels of power more than what I need for a router in my opinion.

        • smotherlove@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          x86_64 is inefficient and insecure

          • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is this board using FOSS RISC-V with open schematics? If not, there’s very good reason to suspect it too.

            • smotherlove@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Also, I trust ARM (almost definitely backdoor’d) over x86_64 (confirmed backdoor’d)

              • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They’re both with backdoors how do you trust either?

                • smotherlove@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t trust either, I’m just saying I trust ARM more. English is confusing and trust can be both boolean and float at the same time

                  ARM trust: 0.2 (false)

                  x86 trust: 0.1 (false)

                  • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    RISC-V FTW

            • smotherlove@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              RK3855 = 4x Cortex-A76 + 4x Cortex-A55

            • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tfOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t know RISC-V routers were a thing. There’s OPNSense support for RISC-V?

              • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                There isn’t. I was asking if the Banana Pi used RISC-V

                • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tfOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s ARM

                  • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yes

homelab@lemmy.ml

homelab@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !homelab@lemmy.ml
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 3 users / week
  • 88 users / month
  • 592 users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 7.62K subscribers
  • 353 Posts
  • 2.7K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • CMonster@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.4
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org