I left the headline like the original, but I see this as a massive win for Apple. The device is ridiculously expensive, isn’t even on sale yet and already has 150 apps specifically designed for that.

If Google did this, it wouldn’t even get 150 dedicated apps even years after launch (and the guaranteed demise of it) and even if it was something super cheap like being made of fucking cardboard.

This is something that as an Android user I envy a lot from the Apple ecosystem.

Apple: this is a new feature => devs implement them in their apps the very next day even if it launches officially in 6 months.

Google: this is a new feature => devs ignore it, apps start to support it after 5-6 Android versions

      • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        They also removed the headphone jack from the phone, so it doesn’t really count. Airpods followed the Sony approach: telling your captive audience they will buy the thing or suffer.

        • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          The dongle really isn’t that bad for people that want the wired experience, but most people don’t care.

        • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Why doesn’t it count? GP asked for an example where post-Job Apple made something mainstream, and the AirPod basically made TWS earbuds and removing jack mainstream (while not necessarily benefits end users). There are gazillion TWS earbuds now ranging from $2 AliExpress special to $400 from audiophile brands, that should count as mainstream.

          Whether Apple can make VR headset mainstream or not, that remains to be seen.

          • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Because it relying entirely on the dominance of the iPhone isn’t really a post-Jobs action. It’s actually the exact opposite: relying entirely on something he captained in order to make sales.

            • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              By this definition, everything that Apple do will count as relying on the dominance of the iphones because how tight their integration between their products is.