Not the best news in this report. We need to find ways to do more.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    basically we dont know what they found, because they just looked up hashtags, and then didnt look at the results for ethics reasons. They dont even say what hashtags they looked through.

    • Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      We do know they only found, what, 112 actual images of CP? That’s a very small number. I’d say that paints us in a pretty good light, relatively.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        112 images out of 325,000 images scanned over two days, is about 0,03% So we are doing pretty well. With more moderation tools we could continue to knock out those sigmas.

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        it says 112 instances of known CSAM. But that’s based on their methodology, right, and their methodology is not actually looking at the content, it’s looking at hashtags and whether google safesearch thinks it’s explicit. Which Im pretty sure doesnt differentiate with what the subject of the explicitness is. It’s just gonna try to detect breast or genitals I imagine.

        Though they do give a few damning examples of things like actual CP trading, but also that they’ve been removed.

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How many of those 112 instances are honeypots controlled by the FBI or another law enforcement agency?

    • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are communities on NSFW Lemmy where people intentionally present as children engaged in sexual abuse scenarios. They’re adults and this is their kink that everyone is supposed to tolerate and pretend is ok.

      See defederation drama over the last couple of days. What I’m saying is, the hashtags mean nothing.

      • hightrix@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are communities on NSFW Lemmy where people intentionally present as children engaged in sexual abuse scenarios.

        If you are referring to the community that was cited as the reason for defederation, this is completely false. The community in question is adorableporn, extremely similar to the subreddit of the same name. No one, in any manner, in either community, presents as a child. While yes, the women that post there tend to be on the shorter and thinner side, calling short, thin adults ‘children’ is not being honest.

        To be clear, this community is about petite women. This community is NOT about women with a kink to present as a child.

          • hightrix@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            What other bait communities? We can’t just accept “think of the children” as an excuse. That doesn’t work.

            Yes, no one wants actual CSAM to show up in their feed, we can all completely agree on that. But just because some middle-aged woman can’t tell the difference between a 20 year old and a 15 year old, doesn’t make images of the 20 year old CSAM.