• sim_@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    You’re omitting the part where OP is fine with the “trash dumping” in the streets of other locales. That’s what makes it NIMBY (as OP admits).

    • acastcandream@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You’re omitting the part where OP is fine with the “trash dumping” in the streets of other locales.

      You’re omitting the part where you are a liar because I said nothing of the sort. But please continue to edit out half my comment to make your point.

      I am totally fine with other cities keeping them out

      [I put] them where they belong instead of leaving them scattered everywhere like an asshole

      Jesus it’s like being back on reddit. Selective reading, complete removal of nuance, the works.

      • sim_@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yikes dude, you’re blaming me for the reddit-esque toxicity.

        I was using the other guy’s wording (“trash dumping”) specifically in quotes because I didn’t agree with that sentiment re: scooters. I’m not making any point about you, I’m talking about the use of the term NIMBYism. Dang.

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      He said he’s all for them banning it as any reasonable jurisdiction must do. He’ll just use them if they decide to ruin their streets.