Not that this is a surprise to some of us.

  • Caaaaarrrrlll@lemmy.ml
    415·
    1 year ago

    To be honest, Ubuntu likely has nothing to do with it and I find the headline therefore misleading. It’s mostly the Linux kernel from how it reads.

    Ubuntu 23.10 was run for providing a clean, out-of-the-box look at this common desktop/workstation Linux distribution. Benchmarks of other Linux distributions will come in time in follow-up Phoronix articles. But for the most part the Ubuntu 23.10 performance should be largely similar to that of other modern Linux distributions with the exception of Intel’s Clear Linux that takes things to the extreme or those doing non-default tinkering to their Linux installations.

      • ExFed@lemm.ee
        122·
        1 year ago

        For those of us still naive … Why does Lemmy say “Ubuntu bad” now?

          • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
            204·
            1 year ago

            The problem is also that the hosting software for snaps, the backend that canonical has is P R O P R I E T A R Y and that’s one of the main gripes.

          • virtualbriefcase@lemm.ee
            72·
            1 year ago

            I’ll add one more grip: Amazon integration. It’s been resolved for like 7 years now, but I still hold it against them a bit for placing Amazon search results in my desktop all those years back. Not that I don’t have an Ubuntu server running as we speak, but it still does taint them a tad in my eyes (and probably acts as an anachronism to the “it’s a corporate distro” theme of dislike around here).

          • ExFed@lemm.ee
            74·
            1 year ago

            Ahh, okay, so nothing new under the sun: Hipsters hate normies and September never ended.

            Although I’m under the impression that Mint and Pop have taken a bite out of the “beginner desktop” market, Ubuntu is most of what I observe in the office when everybody else is booting Windows.

            I can understand selecting for novelty; I’m usually in that camp. But novelty shouldn’t come at the expense of an argument to IT departments that they should support at least one Linux distro.

        • GravelPieceOfSword@lemmy.ca
          71·
          1 year ago

          Proprietary snap store backend that is controlled by Canonical: that’s it.

          I used Ubuntu for years: installed it for family and friends. I moved away around a year ago.

          Moving packages like Firefox to snap was what first started annoying me.

          If the backend was open source, and the community could have hosted their own (like how flatpak repositories can be), I might have been slightly more forgiving.

          Did a quick Google to find if someone had elaborated, here’s a good one:

          • cmhe@lemmy.world
            31·
            1 year ago

            Snap is just one case where Ubuntu is annoying.

            It is also a commercial distribution. If you ever used a community distribution like Arch, Gentoo or even Debian, then you will notice that they much more encourage participation. You can contribute your ideas and work without requiring to sign any CLAs.

            Because Ubuntu wants to control/own parts of the system, they tend to, rather then contributing to existing solutions, create their own, often subpar, software, that requires CLAs. See upstart vs openrc or later systemd, Mir vs Wayland, which they both later adopted anyway, Unity vs Gnome, snap vs flatpak, microk8 vs k3s, bazar vs git or mercurial, … The NIH syndrom is pretty strong in Ubuntu. And even if Ubuntu came first with some of these solutions, the community had to create the alternative because they where controlling it.

  • Pantherina@feddit.de
    9·
    1 year ago

    Do a Gentoo test with correct compilation parameters! Or just Arch, Fedora or Opensuse Tumbleweed okay.