The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoShowing who's in chargelemmy.worldimagemessage-square90fedilinkarrow-up1775arrow-down118
arrow-up1757arrow-down1imageShowing who's in chargelemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.world to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square90fedilink
minus-squareNewNewAccount@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·20 hours ago That’s OP’s claim. No it’s not. OP’s claim is that cults give nicknames. Not that all entities that give nicknames are cults. But your second statement makes me realize that you likely have an inherent bias that is preventing you from seeing the logic involved.
minus-squareUnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-223 minutes ago OP’s claim is that cults give nicknames. Post-Hoc Ergo Proper Hoc Fallacy. “Cults give nicknames, therefore if you give someone a nickname you’re a cult” doesn’t logically follow. you likely have an inherent bias Casual Fallacy. The existence of individual bias does nothing to affirm or reject a claim If we were weighting on bias, your extreme reaction to a casual anecdote would disqualify your observations immediately.
No it’s not.
OP’s claim is that cults give nicknames. Not that all entities that give nicknames are cults.
But your second statement makes me realize that you likely have an inherent bias that is preventing you from seeing the logic involved.
Post-Hoc Ergo Proper Hoc Fallacy. “Cults give nicknames, therefore if you give someone a nickname you’re a cult” doesn’t logically follow.
Casual Fallacy. The existence of individual bias does nothing to affirm or reject a claim
If we were weighting on bias, your extreme reaction to a casual anecdote would disqualify your observations immediately.