We don’t really need to talk about Trump’s corruption. We all know he’s corrupt and none of us are arguing about it.
But when the person who was so corrupt she couldn’t win an election against the orange buffoon starts inserting herself into the conversation, accounts like yours come out of the woodwork to defend her using stale 2016 rhetoric. If there are fake accounts here, I’m pretty sure it’s yours.
Brother Russian bots are at least getting paid for it. You are in this thread “protecting” fucking Hillary of all people, with your life, FOR FREE. Who is the real idiot here?
Truly, there is nothing like sitting in midwest america in trump land and being called a russian bot.
@Sillyglow@lemmy.ca I realize a nuanced view is difficult for many.
Should I insult you before I finish replying?
Is posting a fact about the 2016 election, and Hillary Clinton somehow disinformation?
My point was, that the turd is being a hypocrite, in that part of his campaign in 2016 was capitalizing on her errors in failing to report external country lobbying.
There’s strong evidence to point to Hillary being wrong here and very much the orange turd. Two things can be true.
I’m not trying to what about the facts.
Someone posted a screenshot of her top contributors.
Ah, the Russian bots are working overtime today to distract the left from talking about trump again.
We don’t really need to talk about Trump’s corruption. We all know he’s corrupt and none of us are arguing about it.
But when the person who was so corrupt she couldn’t win an election against the orange buffoon starts inserting herself into the conversation, accounts like yours come out of the woodwork to defend her using stale 2016 rhetoric. If there are fake accounts here, I’m pretty sure it’s yours.
Brother Russian bots are at least getting paid for it. You are in this thread “protecting” fucking Hillary of all people, with your life, FOR FREE. Who is the real idiot here?
Truly, there is nothing like sitting in midwest america in trump land and being called a russian bot. @Sillyglow@lemmy.ca I realize a nuanced view is difficult for many.
Should I insult you before I finish replying?
Is posting a fact about the 2016 election, and Hillary Clinton somehow disinformation?
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2016/oct/16/mike-pence/did-qatar-promise-clinton-foundation-1-million-fiv/
My point was, that the turd is being a hypocrite, in that part of his campaign in 2016 was capitalizing on her errors in failing to report external country lobbying.
There’s strong evidence to point to Hillary being wrong here and very much the orange turd. Two things can be true.
I’m not trying to what about the facts.
Someone posted a screenshot of her top contributors.
I recently watched a video discussing the jet, which played clips of him arguing against her doing the same thing he’s defending. I looked into it and found https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/05/13/trump-plane-qatar-comments/
As I noted in my statement which you replied to - It’s not exactly the same, but comparable.
If anyone wonders why I would even try, please be aware of this adage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandolini's_law
seems the hillary stans can’t respond to evidence
Seems accurate.