Originally this was a reply to this article about a Windows feature called Recall, but there’s a good argument the author’s concerns resonate far beyond Windows and Meta to proprietary generally.

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Stop worrying about the country of origin. It’s a FOSS project. The vast majority of Pop’s components are developed independently of the company, and by citizens of various nations. Applying the “USA bad, so product bad” rhetoric is a seriously shortsighted approach. Consider instead the amount of influence exerted by the company. Does Ubuntu still seem like the better choice just because the company is headquartered in the UK?

    Besides, if you really want to cut American software out of your life, start with Linux and GNU. Torvalds was born in Finland, but he is a naturalized US citizen, and Linux is developed on American infrastructure and includes significant amount of work from American developers.

    • albert180@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They can still sanction your country and then you can’t get updates anymore over official ways, like Fedora and Iran.

      It’s just peace of mind to not deal with anything US Based right now

    • ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s not “USA bad, so product bad”, it’s the concern that the US government can do a lot more to US based projects and you probably wont know untill it’s too late.

      • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That’s really not the case, there’s no proprietary parts to inject this into, and pop is one of the most heavily watched distros for a reason.

        The minimal things they add to their particular distro are essentially just theming, and it’d be really obvious if they injected something malicious into it.

        It would also NOT be too late because they’re a stable distro and have regular releases, it’d have to be a completely last minute unexpected change for that to be the case.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The code is open though, I don’t check it since I am an idiot but I assume pros would spot irregularities.

        Do you have a specific vector of attack here in mind?

        • ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I guess most methods of attack on a FOSS projects are independent of the country of origin. But, I could still see them being forced to do things they don’t want in the US, without being able to tell anyone. Hopefully if that ever happened it wouldn’t be too hard to detect, but you never know.

          • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            People find vulnerabilities and malware even in closed source projects. Us regime is as malicious as it is incompetent. They trust anyone who can throw a sig heil and prompt a LLM to completely dismantle and rebuild major infrastructure.