And yet you are not OP

Upvotes because the devs are good. Sharing does not work well if at all though.

“I WANT ALL THE CLOUD THINGS RIGHT NOW FOR FREE AND I REFUSE TO COMPROMISE 🦶🦶🦶🦶”

That’s what these requests read like.

Look, these people have a product with a good UI and sharing for a reason. Anything else you find that doesn’t hit that mark is because of that. Make concessions for what you really need, build your own, or continue stomping around about it.

Proton Bridge is not an SMTP interface, so this almost surely will not work. Libraries expect requests and responses to the services they speak to ensure they are working correctly.

You need an actual SMTP interface. Can’t recommend running one out on the public internet if you don’t know what you’re doing.

In that case, as someone else said, you may want to take a look at some non-CMS specific style frameworks like Hugo or Jekyll who have tons of these available, but it might be a bit hard to say if you’re not super familiar with markdown for templates and such.

If you’re used to drag and drop and selectors for creating your views, may want to stick with the CMS stuff.

Might be more helpful if you mention what you’re looking for that Grav and Automad don’t cover. There’s a lot of options out there, and you seem to be looking for something pretty specific.

That may look fine from your router’s perspective, but if your network clients don’t get an updated routing tables, they won’t know or possibly accept traffic from the new subnet on the VPN.

OpenVPN does routing a tad differently, but same point applies. Network clients need to know where to go to find a route that isn’t part of the home subnet they are joined too. With containers in the mix without bridging, the host needs to know that the WG subnet can be found at the router.

Wireguard only gets you to the endpoint. You need extra routes from there.

Post your wg config, and possibly the staticnroute table on the router. What kind of OS the router is using might help as well to understand possible firewall rules being a problem.

Solution may be as simple as adding a static route to the Wireguard subnet so your other hosts can find it.

Sure seems dead if you can’t get it to detect via two different routes.

I believe they have an Android app that is supposed to let you configure them I thought. Pretty sure macros don’t require software to run though.

Depends on what you’re doing.

If you want a low-power setup, get a shell with a backplane for 4 drives and an n100 board.

If you want to host games, get an AMD APU on a mini-itx and do the same.

Maybe a 20-40W difference, but the AMD is going to outperform the n100 like a hot knife through butter.

deleted by creator

Guy who posted wants a fix. That’s the downvote.

Almost every ad platform is moving to have their ad DNS server names into the same mix as content servers. Without packet sniffing they are practically indeterminate.

Current list off the top of my head: YouTube, Netflix, Peacock, Disney, Paramount+.

It’s more costly for them, but 🤷

You have an outdated app that isn’t aware of that. Keep it until they force you to upgrade.

Also has a lot of backend options and local encryption at the client.

This is the answer. Just buy bigger drives, and replace them one at a time and let them resize.

Anyone saying to buy expansion units is wrong. It works like ZFS or btrfs, and very seamlessly. I’ve upgraded my drives 4 times with zero issues.

Well I think the difference is what they asked about.

Runpod is a container service. OP asked about remote server.

Yes, but running an LLM isn’t an on-demand workload, it’s always on. You’re paying for a 24/7 GPU instance if going that route over CPU.