• wahming@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is such nonsense. The gangs would be losing something like 90% or more of their money in the process. The only ‘proof’ stated in the article is a bunch of unverified claims by anonymous sources.

  • wim@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Given how little spotify gives to artists, I can’t imagine this being a cost effective way to launder your money at all.

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I could see Steam, or the App/Play stores. 30% is a meaningful split, but it could be a reasonable layer of isolation in exchange. But Spotify?

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not even just Spotify, but first to some other 3rd party that then takes their own cut first. Utter ridiculous logic.

    • Coffee Junky ❤️@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also with an app you just buy it. If the app is like 10 euros that’s pretty fast. But with Spotify you need to listen to streams for hours and hours, it’s fucking slow.

      • abhibeckert@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m pretty sure nobody is actually listening to the songs… they would just be playing them in an empty room. Probably with a bunch of devices playing the songs at once.