- cross-posted to:
- opensource@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- opensource@lemmy.ml
Today I opened the App Store on my GrapheneOS to see, that Accrescent is now mirrored in it.
I know, that GrapheneOS devs have addressed F-droid very negatively it the past (and they still do that), but imo, including Accrescent as a part of official GOS App Store is very harmful for FLOSS movement, as Accrescent does not support any third-party repos, claiming that they are “breaking the Android security model”, and also allows submitting closed-source apps to the repo.
This unlikely to be the reason for me to change OS, as GrapheneOS is still amazing, but devs rhetoric and actions become more and more concerning for me.
GrapheneOS has an approach that always prioritizes security at a technical level over privacy over promoting FLOSS. I think the first two are difficult to balance as they are interrelated but sometimes come at the cost of one another. I think the second is reasonable to have below the first two given the state of app ecosystems in general.
F-Droid does need to improve its approach to security. I can see why projects don’t promote it as a default.
F-Droid does need to improve its approach to security. I can see why projects don’t promote it as a default.
I agree, F-droid hat its problems that have to be solved, but still, F-droid needs help, not a replacement.
deleted by creator
It’s not harming anyone. You can still install FDroid as you wish.
Likewise you can choose not to install closed-source apps.
No, it’s misconception. Optionally free Is not enough.
deleted by creator
That’s a nice piece of propaganda there.
Accrescent devs claims about closed-source software and third party repos isn’t a propaganda?