• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    6 months ago

    “If we allowed encampments in this instance, it would be nearly impossible to stop encampments from other groups in the future without facing challenges of chilling speech or viewpoint discrimination.” —UT President Jay Hartzell

    Yeah, Jay. That’s kind of the point of the right to free speech, free assembly, and protest. That’s why your goon squad dropped all charges against every protestor you arrested, because they didn’t actually commit a crime and were in fact exercising their rights.

    • BigFig@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      While we’re at it, PROTEST ISNT SUPPOSED TO BE CONVENIENT. Yes it makes the decision making hard for the admins, that is the point

      • IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        The law around protesting at school is pretty clear and has specific rules about access for students. You can’t block access to the school but other venues must be provided.

  • Blackout@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 months ago

    No “threats”, just regular ol suppression of the first amendment. The students should strike until that terrible president steps down.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      I dare the President to hold a confidence vote with the faculty. Most university professors don’t appreciate authoritarian leadership.